On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 23:38 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > I don't think we need to hide the fact that some platforms have > > specific alignment restrictions for DMA. So if any drivers make use > > of the alignment, I see no problem with __dma_aligned. > > IIRC, such was proposed several times: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg12633.html > > I guess that we agreed that it's better to tell driver writers to just > use kmalloc. Perhaps -- but only a few days ago in this thread, they were being advised to use ____cacheline_aligned instead! And for this case it really does seem to make sense to keep the buffer in the parent structure rather than allocating it separately. The DMA buffers are tiny and on cache-coherent architectures it's _much_ more efficient just to have them in the original structure and use __dma_aligned. -- dwmw2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
