Re: [PATCH 1/2] elantech: Report tool width when it is known

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:58:18PM +0200, Éric Piel wrote:
> Op 05-05-10 18:39, Dmitry Torokhov schreef:
> > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 02:14:25PM +0200, Éric Piel wrote:
> >> >From observation of the values sent from the hardware version 2, it
> >> seems that the first four bits of byte 1 represents the width. So we can
> >> report it as well. Observed values on my hardware were always between 1
> >> and 12, so let's use this for min and max.
> >>
> > 
> > I think we shoudl have threshold for the firmware version when we start
> > reporting the width.
> > 
> What do you mean? That the width might not be reported correctly by all
> the firmwares? I have no idea if that is the case. For info, IIRC my
> firmware report 2.1 with middle byte 8.
> 

My understanding was that older firmwares would report 0. I might be
mistaken.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux