On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 5:23 PM, David Härdeman <david@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't care either way. Get the input maintainers to agree and I'll > happily write patches that follow that approach (writing TX data to the > input dev will also have to be supported). > > The only real problem I see is if we implement > 1 input device per > rc/ir device (which I think we should do - each logical remote should > have a separate keytable and input device). I forgot about the many to 1 aspect of the receiver. You should have started off with this point and I would have shut up, DRM does not have many to 1 mappings. My radio receivers show up as network devices. So I have multiple devices too. I don't think we want a 'rc' device. The IR transceiver should be an 'ir' device. My radios are already 'net' devices. So my complaint really is, I don't want an three devices - input, rc and net. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
