On Sun, 21 March 2010 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 05:37:37PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 March 2010 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > + usbhid_submit_report(data->hdev, report, USB_DIR_OUT);
> > > > + complete_all(&data->ready);
> > > > + INIT_COMPLETION(data->ready);
> > >
> > > Umm, what does this do, exactly?
> >
> > It wakes up anyone waiting on the completion and then resets the completion
> > as otherwise any future attempt to wait on it would succeed immediately.
> >
>
> You realize that if you re-initialize the completion right after
> signalling it there is a big chance the waiters will miss it (they do
> check completion->done flags that you reset right away.
>
> In general completions are suited for something that happens once (a
> single request - allocated - processed - signalled) but not for
> repeating use.
Would below approach be more correct?
- move the completion to struct picolcd_pending
so it meets the "happens once" requirement
- protect data->pending with a mutex
(though also use spinlock to prevent race between event which
signals the completion and picolcd_send_and_wait() around timeout)
- use the data->lock spinlock to protect multi-report requests from
interleaving
In speudo-code this would be something like:
picolcd_send_and_wait(...)
{
struct picolcd_pending pending;
...
init_completion(&pending->ready);
aquire_mutex(data->mutex);
spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
... // prepare report
data->pending = &pending;
usbhid_submit_report(data->hdev, report, USB_DIR_OUT);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&pending->ready, HZ*2);
spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
if (data->pending == &pending)
data->pending = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
release_mutext(data->mutex);
...
}
picolcd_raw_event(...)
{
...
spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
if (data->pending) {
// copy event data to pending
...
complete(&pending->ready);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
...
}
In picolcd_remove() and picolcd_reset() I could then do something
similar to picolcd_raw_event() to trigger completion with no
data/error in order to skip timeout on the requester side.
Though how should I prevent races on hot-unplug?
Thanks,
Bruno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
