On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:13:34PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 13:10, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:58:24PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:51, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > >> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:44:08AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 03:03, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > >> >> > Hi Linus, > >> >> > > >> >> > Please pull from: > >> >> > > >> >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input.git for-linus > >> >> > or > >> >> > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input.git for-linus > >> >> > > >> >> > to receive first round of updates for the input subsystem. > >> >> > >> >> i'm trying to figure out what the problem is with the ADXL34x and > >> >> AD714x drivers you seem to have accepted (at least, you didnt say > >> >> there was anything left for us to do). i would have expected them to > >> >> be in 2.6.33/2.6.34 already, but it seems they arent moving now. so > >> >> what's up ? > >> > > >> > I am still spooked by the fact that this is an accelerometer and does > >> > not have to be an input device but maybe used for different purposes as > >> > well. > >> > >> the AD714x is not an accelerometer, it's a capacitance touch sensor > >> > > > > OK, will dig it up. > > thanks > > >> i understand the ADXL34x is a bit wonky, but what else would you > >> propose ? or just leave the driver in limbo forever until people > >> forget about it ? > > > > No, just till we have proper framework for it to be merged into. > > that sounds fine, but is there actually something in progress for that > ? waiting for a framework no one is working on is the same in > practice ... I have high hopes that IIO will fill the needs of these kinds of devices. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html