On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Does this look reasonable? I don't know anything about PNPBIOS or
> > ISAPNP, so it handles only PNPACPI. But at least it's a starting
> > point -- and it does enable my system to wake up in response to
> > hitting a key.
>
> I don't know much about power management, but your patch looks
> reasonable to me.
Thanks.
> > --- usb-2.6.orig/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
> > +++ usb-2.6/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
> > @@ -121,12 +121,27 @@ static int pnpacpi_disable_resources(str
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> > +static bool pnpacpi_can_wakeup(struct pnp_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > + acpi_handle handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev);
>
> I would have used:
>
> struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = dev->data;
> acpi_handle handle = acpi_dev->handle;
>
> here because that's what the rest of the PNPACPI code does.
Ah yes. I just copied the code from the corresponding PCI function
without thinking about it very much. I'll update the patch and wait to
hear from other people.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
