On Sunday 14 February 2010 03:03:44 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:29:29PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 08:57:37 Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Michael Poole wrote: > > > > > > > I think this patch is ready for real review. The Magic Mouse requires > > > > that a driver send an unlock Report(Feature) command, similar to the > > > > Wacom wireless tablet and Sixaxis controller quirks. This turns on an > > > > Input Report that isn't published in the input Report descriptor that > > > > contains touch data (and usually overrides the normal motion and click > > > > Report). > > > > > > > > Because the mouse has only one switch and no scroll wheel, the driver > > > > (under control of parameters) emulates a middle button and scroll wheel. > > > > User space could also ignore and/or re-synthesize those events based on > > > > the reported events. > > > > > > > > The first patch exports hid_register_report() so the driver can turn on > > > > the multitouch report. The second patch adds the device ID and the > > > > driver. Some user-space tools to talk to the mouse directly (that is, > > > > when it is not associated with the host's HIDP stack) are at > > > > http://github.com/entrope/linux-magicmouse . > > > > > > I have applied the driver into apple_magic_mouse branch and merged this > > > branch into for-next, so it should appear in the upcoming linux-next. > > > > > This driver (or the hid changes) can triggers an opps. What I did was > > start X. Turn on the magic mouse. It connected on input7&8. Then I > > powered it off and on. This time it conneced on input9&10. Then I > > exited X and got the opps. Note my X does not hotplug the magic > > mouse. I've also included a trace of the udev events that generated > > the log below (if there was a remove after X stopped it would not be > > included). To my eyes it looks like we leak an input device (there is > > not a remove event for input8). > > > > Indeed, we seem to be missing call to input_unregister_device() in > magicmouse_remove(). How does this look? With this udevadm shows input8 being removed and there is no more opps. ---- diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-magicmouse.c b/drivers/hid/hid-magicmouse.c index f94b3e4..71a8669 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-magicmouse.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-magicmouse.c @@ -429,8 +429,11 @@ static int magicmouse_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, static void magicmouse_remove(struct hid_device *hdev) { + struct magicmouse_sc *msc; + msc = hid_get_drvdata(hdev); + input_unregister_device(msc->input); hid_hw_stop(hdev); - kfree(hid_get_drvdata(hdev)); + kfree(msc); } static const struct hid_device_id magic_mice[] = { ---- Thanks Ed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html