>-----Original Message----- >From: ext Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx] > >Hi Samu, > >I still believe that the only thing we need (apart of special plumbing >in >gpio-keys) is a way for userspace clients to subsribe on unsubscribe >from certain events rather than device-wide configuration. This way we >can avoid waking up processes that are not interested in some of the >events. > Hi Dmitry, I just noticed that control interface for gpio was applied to input-tree. We still have a need to disable hw in certain cases. It is probably better to forget generic implementation to input core and make control interface as specific to each driver like proposed some months ago for example for tel4030-keypad driver. Or what do you think? Sw filtering which avoids to wakeup some processes is not proper solution to embedded devices. We need to avoid waking up the processor itself. Br, Samu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
