Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 02/04/2010 02:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> The point is that it is better to name the function right since the beginning. > > Sorry, I misunderstood you for the first time. It's .event member of > hid_driver. Hence I named it dvb_event (or now rc_event or whatever). > > The function may contain decisions on what to do with the event based > for example on quirks set up in .probe. And if the function grows later, > it may be factored out to rc_nokeyup_event. But rc_event is a root for > the decision tree and it should be there forever. Does it make sense now? Ah, ok. Due to the comments at the function, I misunderstood that you were planning to have separate functions for separate quirks. -- Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
