On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:05:07AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:26:41PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 08:19:12AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:53:45PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > > > > > This is third version of the series. Purpose of this patch is to allow > > > > userland to disable GPIO buttons interrupting the CPU. There is now sysfs > > > > interface that can be used to control the buttons by key code or by switch > > > > code. > > > > > > > > I merged those previous 2 patches as one. This is because it made little > > > > sense of having separate patch for adding the 'can_disable' field. > > > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > > - merged previous 2 patches into one > > > > - buttons have 'can_disable' field instead of irqflags field > > > > > > > > Tested with RX-51. > > > > > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > > > Any comments on this? Is it OK to be applied or do I need to change > > > something. > > > > > > > Hi Mika, > > > > SOrry, I am still pondering how to go about it. I am sure that the sysfs > > interface is proper, so at this point it is just implementation details > > that I am not quite sure yet... > > Hi Dmitry, > > Have you decided yet what to do with these patches? > Hi Mika, Sorry, not yet, have been busy with some other stuff ;( -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
