Hi Gerd, on 26 Nov 09 at 00:22, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: [...] >> To sum it up: I don't think this information will be useful at all for >> lircd or anyone else. [...] > I know that lircd does matching instead of decoding, which allows to > handle unknown encodings. Thats why I think there will always be cases > which only lircd will be able to handle (using raw samples). > > That doesn't make attempts to actually decode the IR samples a useless > exercise though ;) Well, in my opinion it is kind of useless. I don't see any use case or any demand for passing this kind of information to userspace, at least in the LIRC context. If there's no demand, why bother? Christoph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html