Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > There is an argument to be made that since it may be desirable for > both IR receivers and transmitters to share the same table of remote > control definitions, it might make sense to at least *consider* how > the IR transmitter interface is going to work, even if it is decided > to not implement such a design in the first revision. > > Personally, I would hate to see a situation where we find out that we > took a bad approach because nobody considered what would be required > for IR transmitters to reuse the same remote control definition data. I briefly though about such possibility, but dismissed it with assumption that we won't transmit the same codes (including "key" codes) that we receive. Perhaps I'm wrong. -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
