Hi Kyungmin, Dmitry, On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 09:17, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> New haptic class support. >> This class handles the haptic devices. > > I'm wondering why a haptic class is needed when there is force > feedback support. Admittedly, I don't know the force feedback > implementation too well, but could someone please enlighten me on > this? Am I missing something here? > > I see haptics as simple force feedback, just with (usually) small > force and short duration. There are devices out there doing haptics > using vibra motors, which I think would be limited if implemented > using this haptics class driver. Would it be somehow problematic > interfacing with the simple haptic hardware using the force feedback > API? Please share your inputs on ff_device usage instead of haptics class. I think Dmitry could add some points here as I don't see much users of ff_device and I don't see any embedded device (like mobile) using it. -- ---Trilok Soni http://triloksoni.wordpress.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
