On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 01:39:21PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 01:24 +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > >> Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > >>> raw_w, raw_x and raw_y is used uninitialized for !raw_n > >> Thanks for the heads up, but actually not, since !raw_n also implies > >> !(ptest > PRESSURE_LOW). > >> > > > > Then can we move 'if (ptest > PRESSURE_LOW && origin)' stuff to 'if > > (raw_n)'. If not then my patch is correct. > > Yes, that's it, thanks. So this patch ought to solve the warning cleanly: > Yes, I like this one much better, applied. > >> > >> > >> I wonder how many cpu cycles in the world are spent making compilers happy. > >> > > > > It is not compiler mistake it is programming/logic mistakes. We should > > be thankful to compiler to pointing mistakes made by us. > Except in cases when the compiler is wrong... > The uninitialized-variable warnings have certainly proved their value many times > over. I was merely reflecting over the fact that the enclosing space of all such > errors could be made smaller by deduction at compile time. > -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
