Dear sir, 2009/8/18 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Wan, > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:44:03PM +0800, Wan ZongShun wrote: >> Dear Dmitry, >> >> Sir, Due to only w90p910 was renamed, other CPUs of the series >> originally was named after NUC9xx, >> the ts and keypad was public use by w90p910 ,nuc950 and nuc920, > > OK, I see. > > so, if >> the 'w90p910-ts' and 'w90p910-keypad' could not be renamed ,I have to >> make the platform device names of nuc920 and nuc960 named after >> 'w90p910-ts' and 'w90p910-keypad' too, Hmm, I think it is so confused. > > May I suggest calling the driver/devices nuc9xx-ts and nuc9xx-ts? Sir, I prefer these nuc9xx more than nuc900 too for representing the series SoCs, but, it just be my embarrassing, I have argued this Naming issue with Nuvoton, and they did not agree me and prefer to use nuc900. I know well it should not have company politics in Linux community, but I have to consider their point of view sometimes. >Then you should have some wiggle room. Also I think you should push out the > patches changing driver names together with your platform code (and not > through subsystem trees), otheriwse there will be a period when drivers > stop binding to your devices. Just make sure you get Acks from the > maintainers and you should be set. Sir, good idea, Can the patch be merged into my platform patch and submit Russell's list? I had hoped that this patches and platform patches could appear at the same time in 2.6.32-rc1, so ,regarding miss binding ,there 's no likelihood of it happening. It should be so？ > And please adjust the Kconfig entries to mention the other chipsets as > well. Ok. thanks! > -- > Dmitry > -- Wan z.s -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
