On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Bruno Prémont wrote: > I wrote the below patch to adjust it's key mappings, though I'm not > sure if/how I should deal with the number keys (0..9) with regard to > keyboard layout and/or numlock key. > > I tried with KEY_0..KEY_9 (default) as well as KEY_KP0..KEY_KP9 but > neither produces optimal results on my machine (laptop with numlock > disabled and belgian keyboard layout, e.g. KEY_1 => '&' unless shift > is down) > > KEY_NUMERIC_0..KEY_NUMERIC_9 are not recognized by Linux console (don't > know if/how userspace understands them) Are they incorporated in the keymap you have loaded? > + // set_bit(EV_REP, hi->input->evbit); Why is this commented out? Otherwise the patch looks good, so if you send it with proper Signed-off-by line, I am OK with merging it. Do you have any idea whether lirc folks have plans to integrate support for this device to lirc eventually? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
