Dear Trilok,
Thanks for your advice, Before resubmit this new patch fixed, there are some questions need your help for clarifying, following:
> Hi Wan ZongShun,
>
>>
>> Add keypad driver for w90p910 evb.
>
> This commit text not sufficient to describe this driver. Please add more detail.
>
>> +config KEYBOARD_W90P910
>> + tristate "W90P910 Matrix Keypad support"
>> + depends on ARCH_W90X900
>> + help
>> + Say Y here to enable the matrix keypad on the W90P910 evb.
>
> EVB? Evaluation Board? If yes, please write evaluation board instead,
> and I hope it should even work with other boards designed with this
> core.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/w90p910_keypad.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/w90p910_keypad.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e8dfcc8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/w90p910_keypad.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2008 Nuvoton technology corporation.
>> + *
>
> Want to update this to 2008-2009 ?
>
>> + * Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation;version 2 of the License.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/input.h>
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>> +#include <asm/mach/map.h>
>
> Why map.h?
>
>> +
>> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
>> +#include <mach/w90p910_keypad.h>
>> +#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
>
> Do you need this regs-clock.h and hardware.h?
>
>> +
>> +/* Keypad Interface Control Registers */
>> +#define KPI_CONF 0x00
>> +#define KPI_3KCONF 0x04
>> +#define KPI_LPCONF 0x08
>> +#define KPI_STATUS 0x0C
>> +
>> +#define IS1KEY (0x01 << 16)
>> +#define INTTR (0x01 << 21)
>> +#define KEY0R (0x0f << 3)
>> +#define KEY0C 0x07
>> +#define RESET 0x00
>> +#define PRESCALE 0xfa
>> +#define DEBOUNCE (0x50 << 8)
>> +#define KSIZE0 (0x01 << 16)
>> +#define KSIZE1 (0x01 << 17)
>> +#define KPSEL (0x01 << 19)
>> +#define ENKP (0x01 << 18)
>> +
>> +#define KGET_RAW(n) (((n) & KEY0R) >> 3)
>> +#define KGET_COLUMN(n) ((n) & KEY0C)
>> +
>> +#define keypad_readl(off) __raw_readl(keypad->mmio_base + (off))
>> +#define keypad_writel(off, v) __raw_writel((v), keypad->mmio_base + (off))
>> +#define res_size(res) ((res)->end - (res)->start + 1)
>> +
>
> Use resource_size please.
>
>> +#define MAX_MATRIX_KEY_NUM (8 * 8)
>> +
>
>> +struct w90p910_keypad {
>> + struct w90p910_keypad_platform_data *pdata;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> + struct input_dev *input_dev;
>> + void __iomem *mmio_base;
>> + int irq;
>> + unsigned int matrix_keycodes[MAX_MATRIX_KEY_NUM];
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void w90p910_keypad_build_keycode(struct w90p910_keypad *keypad)
>> +{
>> + struct w90p910_keypad_platform_data *pdata = keypad->pdata;
>> + struct input_dev *input_dev = keypad->input_dev;
>> + unsigned int *key;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + key = &pdata->matrix_key_map[0];
>> + for (i = 0; i < pdata->matrix_key_map_size; i++, key++) {
>> + int row = ((*key) >> 28) & 0xf;
>> + int col = ((*key) >> 24) & 0xf;
>> + int code = (*key) & 0xffffff;
>> +
>> + keypad->matrix_keycodes[(row << 3) + col] = code;
>> + set_bit(code, input_dev->keybit);
>
> __set_bit please.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int lookup_matrix_keycode(
>> + struct w90p910_keypad *keypad, int row, int col)
>> +{
>> + return keypad->matrix_keycodes[(row << 3) + col];
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void w90p910_keypad_scan_matrix(struct w90p910_keypad *keypad,
>> + unsigned int status)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int row, col, val;
>> +
>> + row = KGET_RAW(status);
>> + col = KGET_COLUMN(status);
>> +
>> + val = lookup_matrix_keycode(keypad, row, col);
>> +
>> + input_report_key(keypad->input_dev, val, 1);
>> +
>> + input_sync(keypad->input_dev);
>> +
>> + input_report_key(keypad->input_dev, val, 0);
>
> So, we don't get interrupt on key release?
In w90p910,there is no way to identify whether the key was released or not,so I have to put above code here to report the key has been released.
>
>> +
>> + input_sync(keypad->input_dev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t w90p910_keypad_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct w90p910_keypad *keypad = dev_id;
>> + unsigned int kstatus, val;
>> +
>> + kstatus = keypad_readl(KPI_STATUS);
>> +
>> + val = INTTR | IS1KEY;
>> +
>> + if (kstatus & val)
>> + w90p910_keypad_scan_matrix(keypad, kstatus);
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int w90p910_keypad_open(struct input_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct w90p910_keypad *keypad = input_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + unsigned int val;
>> +
>> + /* Enable unit clock */
>> + clk_enable(keypad->clk);
>> +
>> + keypad_writel(KPI_CONF, RESET);
>> + keypad_writel(KPI_3KCONF, RESET);
>> + keypad_writel(KPI_LPCONF, RESET);
>> + keypad_writel(KPI_STATUS, RESET);
>> +
>> + val = keypad_readl(KPI_CONF);
>> + val |= (PRESCALE | DEBOUNCE | KPSEL | ENKP);
>
> Care to make someof this configurable through platform data? May be
> debounce and prescale can be configured.
>
>> + val &= ~(KSIZE0 | KSIZE1);
>> +
>> + keypad_writel(KPI_CONF, val);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void w90p910_keypad_close(struct input_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct w90p910_keypad *keypad = input_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + /* Disable clock unit */
>> + clk_disable(keypad->clk);
>
> So this controller doesn't support putting controller FSM into IDLE
> state by writing some bits into it or is it doing auto-sleep?
What you said not be supporting in w90p910,
When to disable this clk,I think the controller will be power down.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __devinit w90p910_keypad_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct w90p910_keypad *keypad;
>> + struct input_dev *input_dev;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + int irq, error;
>> +
>> + keypad = kzalloc(sizeof(struct w90p910_keypad), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (keypad == NULL) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate driver data\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + keypad->pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> + if (keypad->pdata == NULL) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no platform data defined\n");
>> + error = -EINVAL;
>> + goto failed_free;
>> + }
>> +
>> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + if (irq < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get keypad irq\n");
>> + error = -ENXIO;
>> + goto failed_free;
>> + }
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + if (res == NULL) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get I/O memory\n");
>> + error = -ENXIO;
>> + goto failed_free;
>> + }
>> +
>> + res = request_mem_region(res->start, res_size(res), pdev->name);
>> + if (res == NULL) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request I/O memory\n");
>> + error = -EBUSY;
>> + goto failed_free;
>> + }
>> +
>> + keypad->mmio_base = ioremap(res->start, res_size(res));
>> + if (keypad->mmio_base == NULL) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remap I/O memory\n");
>> + error = -ENXIO;
>> + goto failed_free_mem;
>> + }
>> +
>> + keypad->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(keypad->clk)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get keypad clock\n");
>> + error = PTR_ERR(keypad->clk);
>> + goto failed_free_io;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Create and register the input driver. */
>> + input_dev = input_allocate_device();
>> + if (!input_dev) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate input device\n");
>> + error = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto failed_put_clk;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* set multi-function pin for w90p910 kpi. */
>> + mfp_set_groupi(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>
> Could you please point me to implementation of this API? I believe
> this is pin-multiplexing code.
Sure, it is a muti-function pin API, which was defined in /mach-w90x900/mfp-w90p910.c.
What's wrong?
>
>> + input_dev->name = pdev->name;
>> + input_dev->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
>> + input_dev->open = w90p910_keypad_open;
>> + input_dev->close = w90p910_keypad_close;
>> + input_dev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + keypad->input_dev = input_dev;
>> + input_set_drvdata(input_dev, keypad);
>> +
>> + input_dev->evbit[0] = BIT_MASK(EV_KEY) | BIT_MASK(EV_REP);
>
> EV_REP can be done as per platform data, but not a problem to enable
> by default if keypad controller itself is not supporting it
This is not suitable to w90p910?
Maybe I have a mistake to understand EV_REP, how to do for me here?.
.
>
>> + w90p910_keypad_build_keycode(keypad);
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, keypad);
>> +
>> + error = request_irq(irq, w90p910_keypad_irq_handler, IRQF_DISABLED,
>> + pdev->name, keypad);
>> + if (error) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n");
>> + goto failed_free_dev;
>> + }
>> +
>> + keypad->irq = irq;
>> +
>> + /* Register the input device */
>> + error = input_register_device(input_dev);
>> + if (error) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register input device\n");
>> + goto failed_free_irq;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +failed_free_irq:
>> + free_irq(irq, pdev);
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>> +failed_free_dev:
>> + input_free_device(input_dev);
>> +failed_put_clk:
>> + clk_put(keypad->clk);
>> +failed_free_io:
>> + iounmap(keypad->mmio_base);
>> +failed_free_mem:
>> + release_mem_region(res->start, res_size(res));
>> +failed_free:
>> + kfree(keypad);
>> + return error;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __devexit w90p910_keypad_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct w90p910_keypad *keypad = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + struct resource *res;
>> +
>> + free_irq(keypad->irq, pdev);
>> +
>> + clk_disable(keypad->clk);
>> + clk_put(keypad->clk);
>> +
>> + input_unregister_device(keypad->input_dev);
>> + input_free_device(keypad->input_dev);
>
> input_free_device not needed after input_unregister_device.
>
>> +
>> + iounmap(keypad->mmio_base);
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + release_mem_region(res->start, res_size(res));
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>> + kfree(keypad);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver w90p910_keypad_driver = {
>> + .probe = w90p910_keypad_probe,
>> + .remove = __devexit_p(w90p910_keypad_remove),
>
> Care to add suspend/resume support?
>
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "w90p910-keypad",
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
