On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:42:08 +0800 Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:09 +0200, ext Alek Du wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:05:55 +0800 > > Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Actually scrap that, the input layer already ignores events with no > > > state changes, right? > > > > > Yes, correct. I just want to reply your previous mail, but seems you find that. :-) > > The point about your patch breaking debouncing is still valid, though. > > How? If IRQ triggered then the delay work scheduled, after debouncing time, in work, it checks GPIO pin state again, if pin is active, send "1" to input layer -- key pressed, if de-active, send "0" -- no event. I really did test on my board, could you also try it out? Thanks, Alek > BR, > Jani. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
