On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:01:40AM +0800, Li, Yan I wrote: > This seems a change too aggressive for me. Do we have a good reason > for taking this risk? It's generally much easier to find regressions (people complain) than it is to find things that have never worked (people just assume Linux is broken). > Of course if we found the "actual problem" we'd conjure up a better > fix. But before that, I'd prefer the conservative way. Does stock Windows work on the machine? I think this really ought to be a pretty obvious minimal test before adding quirks to the kernel. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
