Re: [PATCH] input: add support for generic GPIO-based matrix keypad

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/5/25 Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Eric/Arve,
>
> 2009/5/8 Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hi Eric,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Eric,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> Original patch by Marek Vasut, modified by Eric in:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. use delayed work to simplify the debouncing
>>>>>>> 2. build keycode array for fast lookup
>>>>>>> 3. combine col_polarity/row_polarity into a single active_low field
>>>>>>> (are there some cases where the GPIOs are externally connected
>>>>>>> with an inverter and thus causing two different polarity requirement??)
>>>>>>> 4. use a generic bit array based XOR algorithm to detect key press/release,
>>>>>>> which should make the column assertion time shorter and code a bit
>>>>>>> cleaner
>>>>>>> 5. remove the ALT_FN handling, which is no way generic, the ALT_FN
>>>>>>> key should be treated as no different from other keys, and translation
>>>>>>> will be done by user space by commands like 'loadkeys'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patch tested on Littleton/PXA310 (though PXA310 has a dedicate keypad
>>>>>>> controller, I have to configure those pins as generic GPIO to use this
>>>>>>> driver, works quite well, though ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any support about removing/clearing ghost/phantom keys? Also we assume
>>>>>> that all gpios in the matrix should be able to generate interrupts so
>>>>>> no polldev support required.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there some info about such ghost/phantom keys? Otherwise I'll
>>>>> assume these are something like sticky control keys?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure if there're any such support in console tools and in
>>>>> input subsystem. Hard to say...
>>>>>
>>>>> And the comments below are of great value, I'll incorporate these
>>>>> suggestions in later submission. Thanks very much.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could you please have look at following gpio_matrix driver?
>>>>
>>>> gpio_matrix.c:
>>>> http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/msm.git;a=blob;f=drivers/input/misc/gpio_matrix.c;h=c1f47651a4937d5c976a9625ca5da389dd7e4a7c;hb=HEAD
>>>>
>>>> gpio_input.c:
>>>> http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/msm.git;a=blob;f=drivers/input/misc/gpio_input.c;h=7e307f267a2a059b64a3fb9c8a379b149016b2f8;hb=HEAD
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mmm... looks not so generic, though. And I still have no idea
>>> about how its phantom key works unless I see its hw.
>>>
>>
>> There should be no hardware specific code in those drivers, and you
>> are free to use them. If you remove the early suspend and wakelock
>> code and replace disable_irq with disable_irq_nosync it may cover your
>> needs. We used to have a separate gpio_matrix (and gpio_keys) like you
>> are proposing to add, but it proved to be too limited since the
>> hardware vendors like to mix direct gpio keys and and matrix keys in
>> the same logical keypad.
>>
>> For the phantom key problem, this occurs with most matrix based
>> keypads/keyboards. For instance, you press two keys in the same row
>> then a third key in another row, but in the same column as one of the
>> first two keys. The driver cannot tell which of the two column you
>> pressed since the current will flow through the first two keys to or
>> from the other column. If you do not have any code to detect this you
>> will report four keys down.
>
> I would suggest that we better move ahead with current gpio_matrix
> driver submitted by Eric and let's get reviewed by Dmitry. Other
> features can be added as an when some one needs them. Is that sounds
> good?
>

Yes, that will be good.

Dmitry,

Could you have a quick look and get some feedback to us, so that
we can still have time to fix and get this into the next merge window
hopefully?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux