Re: lockdep report at resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 10:40 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:

> > > I wasn't able to reproduce this report on my test systems; did you use 
> > > only Linus' current tree, or did it have any other trees pulled in? (I am 
> > > referring to the -wl- in the version string).
> > -wl is the wireless-testing tree, but it has no input stuff in it.
> 
> Well as the dependency chain is fairly non-trivial, even some non-input 
> stuff could be involved in the circular depepndency.

I doubt it -- however, it seems bcm5974 is part of this report, and I
have a patch to that applied
http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/patches/kernel/all/LATEST/005-new-bcm-tp.patch (which doesn't change much, but anyway)

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux