On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i think you severely over-estimate the importance and ratio of > drivers that enable irqs within irq handlers. (Nor does anyone > want to break them really - we want to have a sane default and > we want to flag the broken cases as broken.) For the record, I've been running for some time now with a patch that issues a warning for each IRQ that lockdep forces to use IRQF_DISABLED. On my x86 systems, pretty much every driver triggers that warning. Which makes me think maybe that shoe is being placed on the wrong foot: use of IRQF_DISABLED is the *EXCEPTION* not the rule. At least on one major Linux platform... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
