On Saturday 28 February 2009, Stefan Richter wrote: > Ah, so there /is/ a threaded IRQ handler implementation in > the mainline, down in some driver framework... One that's a bit more powerful than the recent patch proposal, I'd say, since it chains. > Why don't these drivers simply use <linux/workqueue.h>? Most do. In fact, that one *does* ... what's your point? If I hadn't know that more generic threaded IRQ support was already on the way, I might have done more with that particular driver than just massive cleanup. I stopped short of some changes that it seemed genirq should obviate before too long. As always, more cleanup *could* be done. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
