On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 04:32:16PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag 26 Juni 2008 16:26:34 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov: > > Hi Oliver, > > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:44:30PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > @@ -809,8 +831,7 @@ static int usb_cleanup(struct yealink_de > > > if (yld == NULL) > > > return err; > > > > > > - usb_kill_urb(yld->urb_irq); /* parameter validation in core/urb */ > > > - usb_kill_urb(yld->urb_ctl); /* parameter validation in core/urb */ > > > + stop_traffic(yld); > > > > stop_traffic is unneeded here since input core guarantees that close is > > called when you unregister and opened device. Do you have the hardware > > to test? If not I will fold stop_traffic back into yealink_close > > locally. > > > > No, I don't have hardware to test. > OK, then I'll change it. I wonder whether we really need spinlock though or a simple wmb() is enough to make sure other CPUs notice the flag being set before we get to executing usb_kill_urb()... -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
