Hi Jiri,
> >> +static struct hid_driver hid_generic_bt = {
> >> + .name = "hid-generic-bt",
> >> + .id_table = hid_generic_bt_ids,
> >> +};
> >
> > And this one to hidp_driver instead of hid_generic_bt.
> >
> > Also the name "hid-generic-bt" is not okay. Call it "hidp" since that is
> > the driver name. An alternative would be "hid-bluetooth". I don't like
> > the "generic" part and we never used the shortcut "bt" in any sysfs
> > visible file.
>
> Thanks for comments, I fixed all those except this one. The generic- word is
> tested in the core to recognize generic drivers which bind non-blacklisted
> devices and are handled separately. Anyway I've renamed them to
> generic-bluetooth and generic-usb instead of hid-generic-{bt,usb}.
>
> I think the generic word in the driver name is OK, so that one ordinary user
> can see, my device is handled by the generic driver without special
> processing. Would you rather see some flag or something?
actually generic-usb and generic-bluetooth sound perfectly fine to me.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
