Re: multi-input quirk and skip output reports quirk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Anssi Hannula wrote:

> I've encountered another multi-input device that needs the skip output 
> reports quirk (as it contains force feedback output reports), 0925:8866.
> However, maybe we should use another approach, dropping
> HID_QUIRK_SKIP_OUTPUT_REPORTS. Why not just *not* register the input
> device for that report in case the report didn't contain anything that
> was mapped by hidinput_configure_usage(), in hidinput_connect()?

Oh, and I seem to have completely forgotten -- is this quirk needed at 
all? Since commit 82eb12198 we ignore the non-LED output reports in 
hidinput_configure_usages() altogether.

Do you still actually see issues of devices being misconfigured due to 
output reports confusion in hidinput_configure_usage() even in kernels 
having this commit included?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux