Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Anssi Hannula wrote: > >>>> I've encountered another multi-input device that needs the skip output >>>> reports quirk (as it contains force feedback output reports), 0925:8866. >>>> However, maybe we should use another approach, dropping >>>> HID_QUIRK_SKIP_OUTPUT_REPORTS. Why not just *not* register the input >>>> device for that report in case the report didn't contain anything that >>>> was mapped by hidinput_configure_usage(), in hidinput_connect()? >>> as long as we still have the possibility to see the coming data in debug >>> mode, I don't have objection to that. >> Okay. >>> Are you going to make that patch? >> Not right now, maybe in a few weeks. > > I will meanwhile queue the patch below, ok? After the hidinput_connect() > is refactored to ignore devices for which the mappings haven't been > established, we could then remove all the devices for which we have > HID_QUIRK_SKIP_OUTPUT_REPORTS altogether. Ok. > BTW, do you happen to have any idea whether the Quad joypad needs this > quirk too? No, but I guess it is quite probable. > Thanks. > -- Anssi Hannula -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
