On Thursday 07 February 2008 03:54:24 Len Brown wrote: > > The question is, would exporting the GUID virtual device and using that > > as the parent make more sense? So, in the case of hp-wmi, it only uses > > the GUID 95F24279-4D7B-4334-9387-ACCDC67EF61C, so should we use the > > virtual device associated with that GUID as the parent, or just have WMI > > itself as the parent device? I'm really not sure which would be the > > better way to go. > > Why not used generic names like dev0, dev1 etc. > and have the guid be an attribute? Well, we'll have the virtual devices for the GUIDs anyway once I re-spin the relevant patch, so would it not be better to just reuse those, rather than start adding new virtual devices? -Carlos -- E-Mail: carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Web: strangeworlds.co.uk GPG Key ID: 0x23EE722D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
