On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 04:17:35PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.rst states:
>
> If CONFIG_TMPFS is enabled, rootfs will use tmpfs instead of ramfs by
> default. To force ramfs, add "rootfstype=ramfs" to the kernel command
> line.
>
> This currently does not work when root= is provided since then
> saved_root_name contains a string and initfstype= is ignored. Therefore,
> ramfs is currently always chosen when root= is provided.
>
> The current behavior for rootfs's filesystem is:
>
> root= | initfstype= | chosen rootfs filesystem
> ------------+-------------+--------------------------
> unspecified | unspecified | tmpfs
> unspecified | tmpfs | tmpfs
> unspecified | ramfs | ramfs
> provided | ignored | ramfs
>
> initfstype= should be respected regardless whether root= is given,
> as shown below:
>
> root= | initfstype= | chosen rootfs filesystem
> ------------+-------------+--------------------------
> unspecified | unspecified | tmpfs (as before)
> unspecified | tmpfs | tmpfs (as before)
> unspecified | ramfs | ramfs (as before)
> provided | unspecified | ramfs (compatibility with before)
> provided | tmpfs | tmpfs (new)
> provided | ramfs | ramfs (new)
>
> This table represents the new behavior.
>
> Fixes: 6e19eded3684 ("initmpfs: use initramfs if rootfstype= or root= specified")
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> init/do_mounts.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
applied to any older kernel releases. To properly fix this, please
follow the documented rules in the
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
