On 29.06.2015 19:36, Thomas Renninger wrote: > From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx> > > https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905746 > > Version 2: Remove 64-md-raid.rules > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> > --- > modules.d/90dmraid/dmraid.sh | 2 -- > modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/modules.d/90dmraid/dmraid.sh b/modules.d/90dmraid/dmraid.sh > index 3dcff38..cc4390f 100755 > --- a/modules.d/90dmraid/dmraid.sh > +++ b/modules.d/90dmraid/dmraid.sh > @@ -26,8 +26,6 @@ if [ -n "$DM_RAIDS" ] || getargbool 0 rd.auto; then > if [ "${s##$r}" != "$s" ]; then > info "Activating $s" > dmraid -ay -i -p --rm_partitions "$s" 2>&1 | vinfo > - [ -e "/dev/mapper/$s" ] && kpartx -a "/dev/mapper/$s" 2>&1 | vinfo > - udevsettle > fi > done > done > diff --git a/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh b/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh > index e8de5f5..797a58e 100755 > --- a/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh > +++ b/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh > @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ install() { > > inst "$moddir/dmraid.sh" /sbin/dmraid_scan > > + inst_rules 66-kpartx.rules 67-kpartx-compat.rules > + > inst_libdir_file "libdmraid-events*.so*" > > inst_rules "$moddir/61-dmraid-imsm.rules" > Fedora does not have 66-kpartx.rules nor 67-kpartx-compat.rules ... Heinz, do we need the kpartx part still? I reverted to kpartx, because "dmraid" adds a "p" as a seperator by default for the partitions and this breaks existing installations. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
