В Wed, 07 Jan 2015 23:23:27 -0300 Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> пишет: > El 07/01/15 a las 22:55, Nikolai Zhubr escribió: > > 08.01.2015 4:12, Cristian Rodríguez: > >> El 07/01/15 a las 21:43, Lennart Poettering escribió: > >> > >>> Maybe suse forgot to include this service file in the initrd or so? > >> > >> Correct. It appears to be a bug in the dracut package. I wonder why .. > > > > Ok. So should I file a report to opensuse bugtracker? I have no idea if > > the issue is suse-specific actually... Although I know that dracut is > > very new for suse, that might explain it... > > Hrmm.. looking at the dracut upstream sources.. this service is not > included in the required file list. so it is an upstream problem. > > Attached is a patch to fix the problem. > > Are you sure? Where this service is called in initrd then? Note that fsck for root *did* run. dracut runs generator for root in 98systemd/rootfs-generator.sh which does echo "RequiresOverridable=systemd-fsck@${_name}.service" echo "After=systemd-fsck@${_name}.service" And initrd cannot use systemd-fsck-root.service because this service assumes current root is "/" which is of course wrong in initrd. So options are a) somehow dynamically disable systemd-fsck-root.service from within initrd b) pretend systemd-fsck-root.service did run. Which probably is the same as it means overriding service definition c) allow passing real root device to systemd-fsck-root.service. Very ugly hack is [Service] ExecStart=@rootlibexecdir@/systemd-fsck $__REAL_ROOT_DEVICE__ where __REAL_ROOT_DEVICE__ is added by drop-in in initrd, by rootfs-generator.sh [Service] Environment=__REAL_ROOT_DEVICE__=${_name}" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html