On Mon Oct 28 20:41:22 2013 Colin Guthrie <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > 'Twas brillig, and Harald Hoyer at 28/10/13 16:19 did gyre and gimble: > > On 10/28/2013 04:23 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote: > > > > > That being the case, I would propose that the usrmount module be > > > automatically included when /usr is a mount point regardless of on > > > which partition init lives? > > > > Might be the safest option to include it in all non-systemd setups. > > Yeah I didn't actually read Alexander's second email which enumerates > the possibilities better: > > > Same applies to systemd installed in "/". I think there are only 2 > > cases when usrmount module can be omitted: > > 1. systemd module is included > > 2. hostonly + non-separate /usr > > But I guess for 2. it doesn't do much harm including it anyway - it's > just a bit of a no-op. I agree. Reverting the commit 1a1c80f would be enough. > > (sorry for not included the original CC's but GMane messes up the email > addresses - would be nice if someone could ping them to turn the > obfuscation off) > > Col > -- Alexander Tsoy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
