Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] Avoid generating udev rules for vlan interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Harald Hoyer <harald@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 22.05.2012 15:43, schrieb Cong Wang:
>>
>> We use ip=eth0.2:dhcp to get IP for eth0.2 via DHCP, so ifname=eth0.2:XXX is
>> requried by ip=, no?
>
> no, you would need ifname=eth0:XXX
>

Yeah, only specifying ifname=eth0:XXX seems also work.

Actually I am confused by the doc of ifname=, which said:

    Note: If you use this option you _must_ specify an ifname= argument for all
    interfaces used in ip= or fcoe= arguments.

I think it is out-of-date? In my case, "ip=eth0.2:dhcp ifname=eth0:XXX", eth0.2
appears in ip= but does not have to be in ifname=, as you suggested.

What's more, how about bridge and bonding cases? Do we have to specify
the slave device in ifname= instead of the master device??

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux