Re: luks.rules?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: luks.rules?
From: Harald Hoyer <harald@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:34:22 +0200
Cc: initramfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A5E40FB.2010905@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4A5E40FB.2010905@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2

Am 15.07.2009 22:50, schrieb Warren Togami:

modules.d/50plymouth/63-luks.rules
modules.d/90crypt/70-luks.rules

Is the former still used anywhere?

Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx


modules.d/50plymouth/63-luks.rules can be removed

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

References:
- luks.rules?
  - From: Warren Togami

Prev by Date: Re: RFC: mdadm and bringing up raid sets from initrd (dracut)
Next by Date: RFC Bridging plan
Previous by thread: luks.rules?
Next by thread: RFC Bridging plan
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux