modules.d/40network/60-net.rules
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE}"
ACTION=="online", SUBSYSTEM=="net", RUN+="/sbin/netroot $env{INTERFACE}"
This works just fine if you have a single interface. But if you have
more than one interface bad things can happen. If you have two or more
interfaces and root=dhcp, the ifup udev rule attempts to dhclient on all
interfaces simultaneously.
This can be a problem in cases where two or more interfaces are on DHCP
networks. The udev rule kicked off both interfaces simultaneously, so
there is no way to guarantee which of the two will succeed to mount the
rootfs. In my testing this means eth0 or eth1 unpredictably mounted the
rootfs. The other interface meanwhile is configured to an IP address
and has routes added. DNS and routes configured could be either
interface as well.
Locking so only one interface can ifup at a time wont exactly help here,
because you still cannot predict which interface will go first.
It seems we have no way to make it predictable (eth0 attempts before
eth1) while doing ifup from a udev event?
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html