On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 15:25:01 -0600 Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:44:46PM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > Update the example to reflect a future requirement for the generic > > adc-chan node name on ADC channel nodes, while conveying the board name > > of the channel in a label instead. > > I don't think we've defined 'adc-chan' as THE generic name. Looks like > we have: > > adc-chan > adc-channel > channel > > 'channel' is the most common (except for QCom). Good spot. We also have that defined as the channel name in bindings/iio/adc.yaml Now this particular binding doesn't use anything from that generic binding (other than trivial use of reg) but better to be consistent with it than not! Thanks, Jonathan > > Rob
