Hi Jonathan:
On 2021/5/14 0:03, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2021 21:47:39 +0800
Tang Bin <tangbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the function ad7766_probe(), the return value of
devm_iio_device_register() can be zero or ret, Thus it
is unnecessary to repeated check here.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Tang Bin,
A quick query on this sign off sequence as I'd like to check what the
intended meaning is.
If you both developed this patch, please use the Co-developed-by: tag
to indicate that. If Zhang Shengju wrote the patch then you sent it
upstream, please fix the 'from' field on the email to reflect that.
Patch itself is good.
Thanks for your reply, it's my mistake, this place should use:
Co-developed-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
Tang Bin
Thanks,
Jonathan
---
drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c
index b6b6765be..acf56e987 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c
@@ -291,10 +291,7 @@ static int ad7766_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- return 0;
+ return devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
}
static const struct spi_device_id ad7766_id[] = {
