On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 9:24 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > As not many steps were not already devm_ managed, use > devm_add_action_or_reset() to handle the rest. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Cc: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@xxxxxxxxx> double Cc: tag here One minor thought about maybe removing the log spam. Other than that: Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c > index 9c2401c5848e..deb166d2b645 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c > @@ -719,6 +719,16 @@ static void ad7124_reg_disable(void *r) > regulator_disable(r); > } > > +static void ad7124_clk_disable(void *c) > +{ > + clk_disable_unprepare(c); > +} > + > +static void ad7124_buffer_cleanup(void *idev) > +{ > + ad_sd_cleanup_buffer_and_trigger(idev); We never seem to have done a devm_ version for ad_sd_setup_buffer_and_trigger(). > +} > + > static int ad7124_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > { > const struct ad7124_chip_info *info; > @@ -740,8 +750,6 @@ static int ad7124_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > > ad_sd_init(&st->sd, indio_dev, spi, &ad7124_sigma_delta_info); > > - spi_set_drvdata(spi, indio_dev); > - > indio_dev->name = st->chip_info->name; > indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE; > indio_dev->info = &ad7124_info; > @@ -779,48 +787,36 @@ static int ad7124_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&spi->dev, ad7124_clk_disable, st->mclk); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > ret = ad7124_soft_reset(st); > if (ret < 0) > - goto error_clk_disable_unprepare; > + return ret; > > ret = ad7124_check_chip_id(st); > if (ret) > - goto error_clk_disable_unprepare; > + return ret; > > ret = ad7124_setup(st); > if (ret < 0) > - goto error_clk_disable_unprepare; > + return ret; > > ret = ad_sd_setup_buffer_and_trigger(indio_dev); > if (ret < 0) > - goto error_clk_disable_unprepare; > - > - ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev); > - if (ret < 0) { > - dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to register iio device\n"); > - goto error_remove_trigger; > - } > + return ret; > > - return 0; > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&spi->dev, ad7124_buffer_cleanup, indio_dev); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > > -error_remove_trigger: > - ad_sd_cleanup_buffer_and_trigger(indio_dev); > -error_clk_disable_unprepare: > - clk_disable_unprepare(st->mclk); > + ret = devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev); > + if (ret) > + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to register iio device\n"); I guess Andy may come along and suggest that we remove this log spam and just do a direct return. Which would sound like a reasonable idea. > > return ret; > -} > > -static int ad7124_remove(struct spi_device *spi) > -{ > - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(spi); > - struct ad7124_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > - > - iio_device_unregister(indio_dev); > - ad_sd_cleanup_buffer_and_trigger(indio_dev); > - clk_disable_unprepare(st->mclk); > - > - return 0; > } > > static const struct of_device_id ad7124_of_match[] = { > @@ -838,7 +834,6 @@ static struct spi_driver ad71124_driver = { > .of_match_table = ad7124_of_match, > }, > .probe = ad7124_probe, > - .remove = ad7124_remove, > }; > module_spi_driver(ad71124_driver); > > -- > 2.31.1 >