On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 8:44 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 8:40 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > With CONFIG_ACPI=n and -Werror, 0-day reports: > > > > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_i2c.c:46:36: error: > > 'bme680_acpi_match' defined but not used > > > Given the other patch, question of course is if this ACPI ID > > is real. A Google search suggests that this might not be the case. > > Should we remove it as well ? STK8312 has the same problem. > > For this one definitely removal. Looking into the code it suggests a > cargo cult taken that time by a few contributors to invent fake ACPI > IDs while submitting new drivers. > Feel free to add my tag or if you wish me I'll add it explicitly. Had just looked at STK, the same guy as for AOS2315. So, also to remove. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
