On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:50 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> indio_dev was both the macro input parameter and the field name
> in this macro. That causes trouble if the instance of
> struct iio_dev passed in is not called indio_dev.
>
> Whilst a fix of sorts, no need to backport as it seems we never
> hit this previously due to some very consistent naming in IIO.
>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h b/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
> index e66b029d99de..f876e3aede2c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct iio_dev_opaque {
> #endif
> };
>
> -#define to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev) \
> - container_of(indio_dev, struct iio_dev_opaque, indio_dev)
> +#define to_iio_dev_opaque(_indio_dev) \
> + container_of((_indio_dev), struct iio_dev_opaque, indio_dev)
>
> #endif
> --
> 2.31.1
>
