Re: [PATCH 0/7] Adis IRQ fixes and minor improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/13/21 1:20 PM, Nuno Sa wrote:
The primary goal of this series was to fix the return value on some
trigger handlers as spotted in [1]. While doing it, I found some minor
improvements that I think are simple enough to include in this series.

As for the first 2 patches, I opted to not do any functional change so
I'm keeping the 'if (!adis->buffer)' check. However, 'adis-buffer' is
allocated in 'update_scan_mode' hook which means we should be sure that
the buffer is allocated and the check is really not needed. I did not
went into the details but is there any way for the trigger handler to be
called before the 'update_scan_mode' hook? If not, I'm happy in sending
a v2 where we just remove the 'if'...

I do remember that the check was deliberate. I do remember of thinking about whether we need this and feeling uncomfortable about not having the check. But I think it is more a instance of defensive programming rather than actually being required.

It was less about the trigger being called before update_scan_mode, but in case it gets called if the allocation in update_scan_mode fails. But I think this should not be possible. So it is probably safe to remove it.

- Lars




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux