On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:49:27 +0800
Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When devm_request_threaded_irq() fails, we should decrease the
> runtime PM counter to keep the counter balanced. But when
> iio_device_register() fails, we need not to decrease it because
> we have already decreased it before.
Whilst agree with your assessment that the code is wrong, I'm not
totally sure why we need to do the pm_runtime_get_noresume() in
the first place. Why do we need to hold the reference for
the operations going on here? What can race against this that
might care about that reference count?
Jonathan
>
> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/light/gp2ap002.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/gp2ap002.c b/drivers/iio/light/gp2ap002.c
> index 7ba7aa59437c..040d8429a6e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/gp2ap002.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/gp2ap002.c
> @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ static int gp2ap002_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> "gp2ap002", indio_dev);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "unable to request IRQ\n");
> - goto out_disable_vio;
> + goto out_put_pm;
> }
> gp2ap002->irq = client->irq;
>
> @@ -613,8 +613,9 @@ static int gp2ap002_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> return 0;
>
> -out_disable_pm:
> +out_put_pm:
> pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
> +out_disable_pm:
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> out_disable_vio:
> regulator_disable(gp2ap002->vio);
