Re: [PATCH] iio: st_sensors: fix typo in comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:39:44 +0100
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> s/timetamping/timestamping/
> 
> Cc: trivial@xxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied,

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_buffer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_buffer.c
> index eee30130ae23..802f9ae04cf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_buffer.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ irqreturn_t st_sensors_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>  	s64 timestamp;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If we do timetamping here, do it before reading the values, because
> +	 * If we do timestamping here, do it before reading the values, because
>  	 * once we've read the values, new interrupts can occur (when using
>  	 * the hardware trigger) and the hw_timestamp may get updated.
>  	 * By storing it in a local variable first, we are safe.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux