Hello Fabrice,
On 19.01.21 18:56, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> On 1/18/21 12:42 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Hello Jonathan,
>>
>> On 16.01.21 18:53, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:24:42 +0100
>>> Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 1c6c69525b40 ("genirq: Reject bogus threaded irq requests") makes sure
>>>> that threaded IRQs either
>>>> - have IRQF_ONESHOT set
>>>> - don't have the default just return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD primary handler
>>>>
>>>> This is necessary because level-triggered interrupts need to be masked,
>>>> either at device or irqchip, to avoid an interrupt storm.
>>>>
>>>> For spurious interrupts, the STM32 ADC driver still does this bogus
>>>> request though:
>>>> - It doesn't set IRQF_ONESHOT
>>>> - Its primary handler just returns IRQ_WAKE_THREAD if the interrupt
>>>> is unexpected, i.e. !(status & enabled_mask)
>>> This seems 'unusual'. If this is a spurious interrupt we should be
>>> returning IRQ_NONE and letting the spurious interrupt protection
>>> stuff kick in.
>>>
>>> The only reason I can see that it does this is print an error message.
>>> I'm not sure why we need to go into the thread to do that given
>>> it's not supposed to happen. If we need that message at all, I'd
>>> suggest doing it in the interrupt handler then return IRQ_NONE;
>> As described, I run into the spurious IRQ case, so I think the message is
>> still useful (until that's properly fixed), but yes, it should've returned
>> IRQ_NONE in that case.
>>
>> With these changes, IRQF_ONESHOT shouldn't be necessary, but in practice
>> the driver doesn't function correctly with the primary IRQ handler threaded.
>>
>> Olivier, Fabrice: Are you aware of this problem?
>
>
> Hi Ahmad, Jonathan,
>
> I wasn't aware of this up to now. I confirm we've the same behavior at
> our end with threadirqs=1.
>
> Olivier and I started to look at this. Indeed, the IRQF_ONESHOT makes
> the issue to disappear.
> I'm not sure 100% that's for the above reasons. Please let me share some
> piece of logs, analysis and thoughts.
Thanks for looking at this.
> I may miss it but, the patch "genirq: Reject bogus threaded irq
> requests" seems to handle the case where no HW handler is provided, but
> only the threaded part?
There is still a primary handler, but that one does only do IRQ_WAKE_THREAD,
so I assumed that would be equivalent to what the driver is doing in the
spurious IRQ case.
> In the stm32-adc both are provided. Also the IRQ domain in
> stm32-adc-core maybe a key here ?
Oh, missed completely that the stm32-adc-core does the interrupt routing.
> We did some testing, ftrace and observed following behavior for one
> capture (a single cat in_voltage..._raw) :
>
> in stm32-adc-core, as IRQ source is still active until the IRQ thread
> can execute:
> - stm32_adc_irq_handler <-- generic_handle_irq
> - stm32_adc_irq_handler <-- generic_handle_irq
> - stm32_adc_irq_handler <-- generic_handle_irq
> ...
>
> - sched_switch to the 1st IRQ thread
> - stm32_adc_irq_handler <-- generic_handle_irq (again until DR get read)
>
> - stm32_adc_isr <-- irq_forced_thread_fn (from stm32-adc)
> DR read, clears the active flag
> - stm32_adc_isr <-- irq_forced_thread_fn
> wakes the 2nd IRQ thread to print an error (unexpected...)
>
> sched_switch to the 2nd IRQ thread that prints the message.
>
> - stm32_adc_threaded_isr <-- irq_thread_fn
>
>
> So my understanding is: the cause seems to be the concurrency between
>
> - stm32_adc_irq_handler() storm calls in stm32-adc-core
> - stm32_adc_isr() call to clear the cause (forced into a thread with
> threadirqs=1).
I can't follow here. Where does stm32_adc_isr() clear the IRQ cause?
I assumed it can't be isr_ovr.mask, because that's checked in the
primary handler.
> To properly work, the stm32_adc_irq_handler() should be masked in between.
>
> As you explain, this works in this case: the call to stm32_adc_isr (in
> stm32-adc) isn't longer forced threaded with IRQF_ONESHOT.
>
> It looks like IRQF_NO_THREAD for forced threading would have similar
> effect? Maybe the same would be applicable here ? (I haven't tested...)
I guess IRQF_NO_THREAD is meant for use with request_irq and
IRQF_ONESHOT for request_threaded_irq?
> Hopefully this helps and is similar to what you observed.
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Fabrice
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ahmad
>>
>>>> - stm32mp151.dtsi describes the ADC interrupt as level-triggered
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by setting IRQF_ONESHOT to have the irqchip mask the IRQ
>>>> until the IRQ thread has finished.
>>>>
>>>> IRQF_ONESHOT also has the effect that the primary handler is no longer
>>>> forced into a thread. This makes the issue with spurious interrupts
>>>> interrupts disappear when reading the ADC on a threadirqs=1 kernel.
>>>> This used to result in following kernel error message:
>>>>
>>>> iio iio:device1: Unexpected IRQ: IER=0x00000000, ISR=0x0000100e
>>>> or
>>>> iio iio:device1: Unexpected IRQ: IER=0x00000004, ISR=0x0000100a
>>>>
>>>> But with this patch applied (or threaded IRQs disabled), this no longer
>>>> occurs.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Reported-by: Holger Assmann <has@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Fixes: 695e2f5c289b ("iio: adc: stm32-adc: fix a regression when using dma and irq")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
>>>> index c067c994dae2..7e0e21c79ac8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
>>>> @@ -1910,7 +1910,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>
>>>> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, adc->irq, stm32_adc_isr,
>>>> stm32_adc_threaded_isr,
>>>> - 0, pdev->name, indio_dev);
>>>> + IRQF_ONESHOT, pdev->name, indio_dev);
>>>> if (ret) {
>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n");
>>>> return ret;
>>>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
