Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() instead of open-coding it. This documents intent
and makes it more clear what is going on for the casual reviewer.
Generated using the following the Coccinelle semantic patch.
// <smpl>
@r1@
expression x;
constant C1;
constant C2;
@@
((x) + C1) / C2
@script:python@
C1 << r1.C1;
C2 << r1.C2;
@@
try:
if int(C1) * 2 != int(C2):
cocci.include_match(False)
except:
cocci.include_match(False)
@@
expression r1.x;
constant r1.C1;
constant r1.C2;
@@
-(((x) + C1) / C2)
+DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(x, C2)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iio/light/vl6180.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/vl6180.c b/drivers/iio/light/vl6180.c
index 4775bd785e50..d47a4f6f4e87 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/vl6180.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/vl6180.c
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static int vl6180_set_it(struct vl6180_data *data, int val, int val2)
{
int ret, it_ms;
- it_ms = (val2 + 500) / 1000; /* round to ms */
+ it_ms = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val2, 1000); /* round to ms */
if (val != 0 || it_ms < 1 || it_ms > 512)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.20.1
