On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:57 AM Tomasz Duszynski <tomasz.duszynski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:52:25PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 9:42 PM Tomasz Duszynski > > <tomasz.duszynski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 02:43:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:05 PM Tomasz Duszynski > > > > <tomasz.duszynski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:49:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 5:22 PM Tomasz Duszynski > > > > > > <tomasz.duszynski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > > As for ABI that's in > > > > > a separate patch. > > > > > > > > It's not good from bisectability point of view. If by some reason this > > > > patch or documentation patch gets reverted, the other one will be > > > > dangling. > > > > Please, unify them. > > > > > > > > > > Huh? Reverting core and leaving leftovers would be wrong and pointless. > > > > Exactly my point why it should be one patch. To secure impossibility > > to do pointless reverts. > > > > But the same applies to other driver parts like i2c or serial > interfaces. I don't buy it. They won't compile without core driver, right? Absence of the documentation OTOH doesn't prevent build. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
