pt., 17 kwi 2020 o 12:50 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:13 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > irq_domain_reset_irq_data() doesn't modify the parent data, so it can be > > made available even if irq domain hierarchy is not being built. We'll > > subsequently use it in irq_sim code. > > > > @@ -475,7 +476,6 @@ extern int __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, int irq_base, > > extern void irq_domain_free_irqs(unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs); > > extern int irq_domain_activate_irq(struct irq_data *irq_data, bool early); > > extern void irq_domain_deactivate_irq(struct irq_data *irq_data); > > - > > static inline int irq_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, > > unsigned int nr_irqs, int node, void *arg) > > { > > Seems extra hunk slipped to the patch. > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko Indeed, I'll wait for more reviews though before resending. Bart