On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 08:25:22PM +0530, Rohit Sarkar wrote: > scnprintf returns the actual number of bytes written into the buffer as > opposed to snprintf which returns the number of bytes that would have > been written if the buffer was big enough. Using the output of snprintf > may lead to difficult to detect bugs. Nice. Have you investigate the code? > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static ssize_t adis16136_show_serial(struct file *file, > if (ret) > return ret; > > - len = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%.4x%.4x%.4x-%.4x\n", lot1, lot2, > + len = scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%.4x%.4x%.4x-%.4x\n", lot1, lot2, > lot3, serial); > > return simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, len); The buffer size is 20, the pattern size I count to 19. Do you think snprintf() can fail? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko