niedz., 8 mar 2020 o 18:59 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > niedz., 8 mar 2020 o 14:51 Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:12:37 +0100 > > Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Add the remove() callback to irq_domain_ops which can be used to > > > automatically dispose of any host data associated with the domain when > > > irq_domain_remove() is called. > > > > I have a hard time buying this. Whatever data that is associated to the > > domain is already owned known by whoever created the domain the first > > place. > > > > Since the expected use case is that whoever created the domain also > > destroys it, the caller is already in a position to do its own cleanup, > > and we don't need any of this. > > > > So please explain what you are trying to achieve here. > > > > I'm mainly trying to remove irq_domain_remove_sim() and make it > possible to destroy the interrupt simulator domain with regular > irq_domain_remove(). If you prefer that we retain this routine as is, > I can limit this series to the first two patches, but I assumed the > fewer functions in the interface, the better. If you have a different > idea on how to do this - please let me know too. > > Bartosz While this is being discussed - are the first two patches uncontroversial enough to make it into v5.7? Bartosz
