On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 14:48:40 +0200
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:07:07 +0200
> > Sean Nyekjaer <sean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > The interrupt source can come from multiple sources,
> > > fifo and wake interrupts.
> > > Enter interrupt thread to check which interrupt that has fired.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 4 +---
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > > index 810807c52d5f..80a94335175f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > > @@ -1717,9 +1717,7 @@ static struct iio_dev *st_lsm6dsx_alloc_iiodev(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw,
> > >
> > > static irqreturn_t st_lsm6dsx_handler_irq(int irq, void *private)
> > > {
> > > - struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw = private;
> > > -
> > > - return hw->sip > 0 ? IRQ_WAKE_THREAD : IRQ_NONE;
> > > + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> >
> > I missed this before. Isn't this the same as just not providing a top half at all?
> >
> > I.e. Pass null to request_threaded_irq where this function was.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
>
> Right, for the moment we do not need it. It will be probably useful adding
> buffering support for sensors that do not support hw timestamping in FIFO
> (e.g. LSM9DS1). I am fine both ways, so up to you.
Scrap it for now. I suspect someone will have a script out there that will
fire on this and generate a patch removing it. Better to not waste people's
time!
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Regards,
> Lorenzo
>
> >
> >
> > > }
> > >
> > > static irqreturn_t st_lsm6dsx_handler_thread(int irq, void *private)
> >
